True Christians are the disciples of Jesus, the Word of God.
True Christians are the disciples of Jesus, the Word of God.
The King James Bible has been free and public since 1611. It was written, responsive to the order of King James, to eliminate the various versions of the Word of God because they corrupted the Word.
The official introduction to the King James Bible (provided below) refers to the other versions of the time as "vulgar". An 1828 Webster's definition of vulgar is "rustic; rude; low; unrefined; as vulgar minds; vulgar manners...". Clearly, the other versions were and are now not the best source of understanding of the Word because they cannot be reconciled by their own words. Remember, however, we are reconciled to God the Father through His Word, not our own versions of it.
Changing the Word is dangerous.
Saved.Church proved the King James New Testament IS the only New Testament that is reconcilable on its words alone, the other versions of our day are rustic, unrefined, rude, low, "vulgar" (archaic), because the New Testament in them cannot be reconciled using only the words written in it.
The original King James Bible is the Word of God. The King James New Testament is reconcilable, all others are not!
The Words says:
Study to shew thyself approved unto God,
a workman that needeth not to be ashamed,
rightly dividing the word of truth.
2 Timothy 2:15.
The most reliable Bible is, without a doubt, the King James Bible. It is also the ONLY New Testament that can be reconciled using only its words.
Furthermore, despite what so many for-profit publishing companies would have you believe and the numerous faulty references to the King James Bible as a "version" as if the Word of God has many variants from which we can pick and choose, the King James Bible and New Testament are NOT a "version." The King James Bible IS the Bible, and all others are the "versions". ALL the "versions" cannot be reconciled by the words written in them. This fact should cause great concern if you want the truth.
The King James Bible was given to the public from the day it was produced. It's free and has been since 1611, long before the "versions." People and publishers changed the Word to make money selling copyrighted books to cash in on religion, and in doing so, they separated man from the Father.
Proof: "The English Hexapla" of the New Testament was originally published by Samuel Bagster and Son, England. It is now hard to find and available as print-on-demand only. The English Hexapla contains all six of the original English language translations of the New Testament. They are: Wyclif (1380), Tyndale (1534), Cranmer (1539), Geneva (1557), Rheims (1582), and the King James (1611). Not surprisingly, all six are almost word-for-word identical, and each is consistent with respect to the trinity of God and the use of the term "Holy Spirit" to mean the Spirit of God, the "Spirit," comprised of the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost. Thus, the reliability of the King James New Testament cannot be successfully challenged.
Yes. Since it was written in 1611, the King James Bible (the "Bible") is the foundation for all the later "versions" of the Bible, as mentioned previously. All of the versions are "derivative works" (a copyright law term) written by others who changed the Word to create a new "version."
In copyright law, a "derivative work" is a work of authorship that is derived from a previous work. The derivative work cannot be distributed or sold unless the previous work from which it was derived is in the public domain, such as the King James Bible, or the author/owner of the copyright to the previous work grants permission. That's also why we see so many "versions" get "updated" over time. It's an opportunity to sell another book because your edition is outdated. The King James Bible is never outdated.
(Note: The Bible must be timeless, meaning the scriptures must consistently present God's identity throughout, covering the past, present, and future of human history even though He reveals Himself differently as history progresses. This is where the context of the scriptures is important. Please use the King James Bible. If all believers did that, we would all be in one mind and one accord, and great revival would occur.
Beware: The attached document (bottom of this page) briefly lists the versions that changed the Word of God.)
No. "Holy Spirit" can mean the Father, the Word, the Holy Ghost, and any combination of the three. The Holy Ghost means the Holy Ghost, the Spirit of Truth. Changing the Holy Ghost to the Holy Spirit causes confusion.
Reproof: If the versions can change “Holy Ghost” to “Holy Spirit” as if they were interchangeable, what about changing the one occurrence of “Holy Spirit” and the three instances of "holy Spirit" to “Holy Ghost”? If we made those four changes, the Word would change significantly because the context of the above verses would incorrectly limit the Spirit only to the context of the Holy Ghost (the Spirit of Truth).
Result: Confusion results from changing the Holy Ghost to the Holy Spirit.
Changing the Word of God corrupts it, causing confusion and quenching of the Spirit.
Webster's 1828 dictionary defines "Quench" as: "1. To extinguish; to put out; as, to quench flame. 2. To still; to quiet; to repress; as, to quench a passion or emotion.
3. To allay or extinguish; as, to quench thirst. 4. To destroy. 5. To check; to stifle; as, to quench the Spirit. 1 Thessalonians 5:19."
The Spirit itself beareth witness with our spirit, that we are the children of God: Romans 8:16.
This means we are born again as evidenced by the Spirit of God (the Holy Spirit) bearing witness with our spirit (truth) in us that we are the children of the Father (God).
Yes.
Using what you know now, compare your version to the King James New Testament by looking for the use of Holy Ghost, Holy Spirit, holy Spirit, and Spirit. We know the Spirit (of God) is most certainly holy ("Holy"). Many of the most popular versions are listed by acronym and identified in the key at the bottom.
Also notice the oddities in the key. Oddly, there is an NIV and a NIVUK. Does that mean the people in the UK have a different NIV than America, when proper English came from the English? Publishers change the Word for money. Please do not forget that fact.
(The examples we provide on this site are definitely NOT the only examples of how the "versions" have corrupted the Word.)
Correct:
Note: The use of Spirit in the first instance of the verses above refers to the Word of God as the Spirit. The Spirit is available instantly for us to partake of (drink) through the Word of God and shall flow from us if we believe in Him, Jesus the Word. The Spirit isn't postponed, or nobody could be born again in their lifetime on earth. We are born again by (according to) the Word of God.
______________________
EVERY time the King James Bible uses Holy Ghost it gives the proper context. To replace the Holy Ghost changes the context, corrupts the Word, prevents learning of Him, and separates man from the Father. See for yourself. I'll do a few to point out the problems.
Correct:
AMP (confusing):
[The bracketed language is in the Amplified Bible (AMP) Copyright © 2015 by The Lockman Foundation, La Habra, CA 90631. All rights reserved.]
The obvious problem: Is the [Holy] Spirit the Holy Ghost, and is the second use of the word Spirit "unholy"? What does afterward mean? After what?
ESV (confusing):
English Standard Version (ESV) Copyright ©2001 by Crossway Bibles.
The obvious problem: Was the Spirit given or not? The ESV suggests the Spirit was not yet given, but it had been given as the Word of God.
NKJV (confusing):
New King James Version (NKJV) Scripture taken from the New King James Version®. Copyright © 1982 by Thomas Nelson.
The obvious problem: Is the first use of "Spirit" holy or not? Is it the same "holiness" as the Holy Spirit? Can Holy Spirit also mean the Word or the Father? If not, why replace the Holy Ghost with the Holy Spirit, knowing the change is unnecessary and may cause confusion?
Comment: The for-profit company Thomas Nelson Publishers owns the copyright and earns a profit, selling scriptures that are different from the original King James Bible which is free and always has been.
AMPC (confusing):
Amplified Bible, Classic Edition (AMPC) Copyright © 1954, 1958, 1962, 1964, 1965, 1987 by The Lockman Foundation.
The obvious problem: If the [Holy] Spirit can be the Word, the Holy Ghost, and/or the Father and it isn't the first use of Spirit, is the first use "unholy," or can it be the Holy Ghost which we know had not been given? If [Holy] Spirit means Holy Ghost, why change it? Comment: The AMPC is a copyrighted work a publisher owns. They alone made six different versions of the Bible!
NIV (confusing):
New International Version (NIV) of the Holy Bible, New International Version®, NIV® Copyright ©1973, 1978, 1984, 2011 by Biblica, Inc.® All rights reserved worldwide.
The obvious problem: The Spirit is given the moment we believe. That Spirit (the Word) leads us to repentance and becoming born again, saved.
Comment: The NIV is blasphemous because it says we don't get the Spirit until later, whenever that is, but the living water is in us the moment we drink (partake of the Word), and it flows from us for others to drink the moment we believe.
ASV (confusing):
The obvious problem: The ASV suggests the Spirit was not yet given, but it had been given as the Word of God.
DARBY (confusing):
The obvious problem: Was the Spirit available or not? The DARBY version creates confusion. The Spirit was given as the Word of God.
________________
I'll leave the rest to you.
Changing the Father's Word is a direct assault on Him, but it seems most people don't care. Nobody can justify changing the Word of God.
Yes. The King James Bible is the Bible. All other English language "versions" have changed the Word of God. How can "let's change the Word of God" ever be a good idea when the Word is God? Think of where we might be if we all had the exact same Bible and none other existed.
So what happened? How did it happen? How did the specific term Holy Ghost refer to the Father's spirit/will get replaced by the Holy Spirit, a catchall term for the Spirit of God? What does the Bible say about this?
The love of money is the root of all evil. People (and publishers) who love money changed the Bible to sell books and cash in on religion. Changing the Word of God is, by definition, the root of evil because the Word is God.
There is no excuse for anyone who never bothered to learn of Him, Jesus-the Word, on their own.
Accordingly, many may miss their calling of God because the "version" of the Bible they follow prevents them from knowing the Holy Ghost is the means to communicate with the Father.
Caution: Please do not replace Holy Ghost with Holy Spirit in your study of the New Testament. Doing so causes confusion. God is not the author of confusion.
Removing the Holy Ghost also gives rise to a cheap grace doctrine that avoids repentance and separates you from knowing the will of the Father personally and individually.
Today, we are missing the signs and wonders, diverse miracles, and gifts of the Holy Ghost because many people have no idea who or what the Holy Ghost is.
The enemy knows if it can hide an understanding of the Spirit of God, then some people will never find their true calling to share the gospel and others will be lost as a result. Think of it this way:
Preachers who don't use the purest Bible, the King James Bible, do not know the Spirit as well as they could. Most, however, will double down in defense of their versions that removed the Holy Ghost because of pride, having determined the gain in rectifying the error isn't worth it, or they like being the middleman. Others are paid to endorse a substandard "version" proving they can be bought.
It's worth mentioning that many of the stalwarts rejecting the notion they should return to the pure Word were taught to use a version replacing the Holy Ghost with the Holy Spirit since their seminary days. The problem is that, like all institutions of higher learning, publishers sell their textbooks to the institutions and the professors. The King James Bible is free!
Thus, if a seminary uses a version of the Bible that changes the original scriptures of the King James Bible, the error gets passed along as evil is considered good.
Comment: Please don't be one of those preachers, teachers, etc., who face Jesus in the end knowing you didn't share the purest form of Him to feed His flock. Read John 6:47-71 knowing the Word of God is God and the "bloodline" of Jesus is the Spirit. His flesh is the shewbread (spiritual food). If the Word is our spiritual food, why don't the members of the body of Christ demand the purest food, the pure Word of the King James Bible?
Saved.Church
Albany, Oregon
You may use, copy, link to, and distribute anything on this site provided you give attribution naming where you got it. You may not create derivative works from the content provided here. People did that to the King James Bible, and in doing so, they caused a lot of confusion and led people astray. Jesus said, I give you power over all the power of the enemy, and nothing by any means shall hurt you!
©2008-2024 Saved.Church. All rights reserved.